Mercy towards Richard Moore reflects true justice and humanity

(File/Getty Images)

On November 1, 2024, South Carolina will execute Richard Moore for the murder of James Mahoney in 1999.

Although Mahoney’s death was a heartbreaking tragedy, Moore’s execution It raises significant concerns about fairness, justice and humanity.

Governor Henry McMaster has the power to intervene both as a universal act of humanity and compassion, and to prevent the death penalty, at least in cases where its application exacerbates rather than solves injustice.

Moore entered the store intending to commit robbery but was unarmed. During the encounter, store clerk Mahoney pulled out two guns and a fight broke out. Both men were shot and Mahoney tragically lost his life.

Moore’s actions led to this outcome, but there was no premeditated intent to kill.

This was a robbery gone terribly wrong, not a calculated act of murder. In South Carolina, the death penalty is reserved for cases involving intentional cruelty and clear intent to kill. But this case doesn’t even come close to meeting that standard.

As someone who has fought for justice in many ways, Governor McMaster knows how important it is that the punishment fits the crime.

The death penalty is South Carolina’s most severe penalty and should not be imposed where there is any premeditation or suspicion of premeditation.

That’s not what’s happening here.

Richard Moore deserves to be held accountable and has been in prison for 25 years – more than half of his adult life – but taking away the rest of his life would be a gross violation of justice.

Moreover, racial prejudice tainted Moore’s trial. The prosecutor dismissed all Black jurors, leaving an almost entirely white jury to decide the fate of a Black man.

In a state like South Carolina, which has a history of racial inequality in its criminal justice system, this poses serious problems
There are concerns about the fairness of Moore’s sentence. The possibility that racial bias played a role in sentencing a man to death should warrant pause before proceeding with such an irreversible punishment.

It can Why first instance judge?Two of the original jurors, the former director of the state prison system, and numerous state and community leaders sought clemency for Moore, stating that Moore “is deeply remorseful for his crime and has been a force for good behind bars for inmates and inmates alike.” their children and grandchildren.”

Beyond legal arguments, this is about realizing the potential for rehabilitation.

Thanks in large part to the efforts of South Carolina Department of Corrections Director Bryan Stirling, South Carolina has one of the lowest recidivism rates in the country, reflecting the effectiveness of its sentencing system.

Both Governor McMaster and Stirling prioritized “enabling inmates to turn their lives around,” so Moore’s “impeccable record behind bars and reputation for helping other inmates deserves a reprieve.”

Instead, the state plans to execute a model prisoner who was a force for good in prison and said he “still has a story to tell.”

If we throw away the key the moment we close the cell door, why do we advocate for and invest in rehabilitation? If even full rehabilitation results in lethal injection, what incentive do we give inmates to be model inmates?

Clemency would allow Moore to spend the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole, meaning he could spend his time reflecting on his actions and taking responsibility.

This will promote justice while also concretely demonstrating the preciousness of all life and the hope of salvation.

As someone who has worked in the justice system for years and advocated for the sanctity of life, I know how deeply personal these types of decisions are. This is not just about law; It’s about humanity.

Governor McMaster, you have championed the values ​​of fairness and justice, and this is a time to show that South Carolina believes in holding people accountable without needlessly taking lives.

Compassion for Moore does not diminish the seriousness of his crime; ensures that the punishment is appropriate to the crime. In South Carolina, the death penalty is reserved for the worst of the worst, and as tragic as this case is, it doesn’t meet that high bar.

Moore’s execution will not bring back James Mahoney and will not provide the true closure that many victims’ families hope for. In fact, research shows that executions often deprive families of the healing they seek.

Governor McMaster, mercy is the right choice here. This reflects South Carolina’s commitment to fairness, justice, and the possibility of rehabilitation. You can make a decision based on both justice and humanity by commuting Richard Moore’s sentence to life in prison without parole.